The Mockingjay Lives: Review of “Mockingjay, Part 1”

Screen Shot 2014-11-21 at 1.17.29 PM

Oddly enough, when I went into my showing of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1, I felt maudlin. Like The Dark Knight before it, Mockingjay gave us some of the best marketing in the many months leading up to its premiere. At one point, I was more excited about the reveal of the latest promo video than the actual film. Here’s hoping the marketing for the second part, due out next year, does not fall flat.

Anyway, onto the actual movie. Please tread carefully, as there will definitely be spoilers ahead.

A few caveats: this was the first Hunger Games film I saw in theaters and also the first film of the series that I saw after reading the books. Before this, I had only the integrity of the film and my best friend (who had read the books before any of us) to explain anything I did not understand. Therefore, I watched this film acknowledging that I was bringing the baggage of the book and at times, often wondered if I would find it as accessible had I not read it.

For those who have NOT read the Hunger Games trilogy: you may be surprised by how dark and violent this film is. Based on The Hunger Games and Catching Fire, you may go in expecting the subdued violence of the Games and the overt bad-versus-good dichotomy of the Capitol versus the rest of the districts. Mockingjay, however, has none of these. At it’s most basic, it’s a political thriller.

Fans of the books will find this an improvement over the novel. Since its release, Mockingjay has been lambasted by readers as being the most boring of the series, due to the fact that it takes place almost entirely in District 13 and within Katniss’ seemingly passive inner monologue. By removing Katniss’ inner monologue, the filmmakers were free to explore more of the secondary characters and not be dragged down by the monotony of life in District 13.

Screen Shot 2014-11-21 at 1.13.23 PMIf you have not read the books, however, I can easily see how Mockingjay may be a jarring and confusing experience. Plot points that are key elements of the novels, such as Finnick’s relationship with Annie, the Capitol’s cruelty towards Avoxes, and the mere existence of the underground and fully operational District 13, are presented as if all the viewers are already well aware of their existence. While a bit of backstory is given, I doubt there was enough exposition to explain things to new viewers.

Like I said, Mockingjay is a dark film, and viewers should be aware that the violence is predominantly gun-related and bombings, which can be upsetting. Furthermore, there is a sequence during the bombing of District 13 where power is out and flashing emergency lights are used. Contrasting against the darkness of the suspenseful scene, the bright flashing lights can be triggering and there was a distinctly claustrophobic feel to this scene.

Casual viewers may be surprised by how political charged the movie is, especially when they may be expecting a straightforward YA adaptation about a love triangle. The so-called love triangle (which I never felt was all that important or even truly real) takes a major backseat in Mockingjay. Gale, finally, is given his moment to shine and while his fixation on destroying the Capitol and blind acceptance of President Coin isn’t explored all that much, it’s clear that Gale is now a soldier and nothing more.

Jennifer Lawrence’s Katniss has matured but in an extremely damaged way and there were several scenes where she suffered from panic attacks. Her reactions to the destruction of her home, Peeta’s torture, and the bombing of the hospital felt real and not at all overdone. While I still wish The Hunger Games had explored casting a woman of color in Katniss’ role, I can’t deny that Jennifer Lawrence has done a solid job of portraying this complex hero.

Screen Shot 2014-11-21 at 1.16.02 PM

I also enjoyed (which may be the wrong word for it) Peeta’s scenes, which were almost all done via Capitol propaganda. I have no idea if Josh Hutcherson actually lost weight for the role or if it was SFX, but Peeta was a gaunt, ghostly shell and he was capable of breaking your heart. I genuinely can’t wait to see his struggle and final redemption in the second film next year.

Another high point was Plutarch, Beetee, Effie, and the rest of the people behind the propaganda for the rebels. I found it thrilling that Mockingjay wasn’t afraid of showing how similar District 13 is to the Capitol in its use of ideology and symbols for essentially brainwashing purposes. A great many of our us-versus-them films stick to a stark black and white theme (ex. Star Wars, the Harry Potter series). The Hunger Games shows us the shades of grey and how easy it is for a hero to become a villain. Fan favorites such as Haymitch and Effie were used sparingly but enough to provide moments of much-needed levity. Screen Shot 2014-11-21 at 1.14.12 PM

Unfortunately, President Coin, played by Julianne Moore, was a weak spot in an otherwise well-casted film. For some reason, I could not remove Moore the actress from Coin the character. I just saw Moore in a grey wig. While she is definitely a good actress, she was definitely too young for the role and rather vapid. Perhaps the second film, which will show more of Coin’s plans, will give her more to work with.

I was also disappointed in the way Finnick’s revelation of his sexual abuse at the hands of President Snow and Snow’s own dark history was presented. Due to the way Finnick’s promo was edited, it felt jumpy and the audience was too busy focusing on the suspenseful aspects of the scene (which I won’t go into here) to pay much attention to Finnick. I always felt that this moment was a crucial one and thoroughly shows the true horrors of the Capitol but sadly, it did not deliver the same hard-hitting punch as it did in the novel.

Overall, Mockingjay is the probably the superior film in the series so far but I do think it’s not as gripping or entertaining as the thrilling Catching Fire. There are moments that can definitely make you cry or shock you and the ending will make you anxious for the next one, which we have to wait a whole other year for. If you were disappointed in the book, you will be pleasantly surprised by the film and definitely engaged by it. If you haven’t read the books, you may be confused but I highly doubt that will prevent you from being wrapped up in the gripping suspense of Mockingjay.

Did you see Mockingjay yet? What were your thoughts? How are you going to handle the yearlong wait for the next one? Tell us below!

Author: Kerry


-

Read our policies before commenting.
Do not copy our content in whole to other websites. Linkbacks are encouraged.
Copyright © The Geekiary


About the author

Comments

  1. I just saw Mockingjay this evening and I thought it was great. However, I have to say I completely agree about Finnick’s ‘revelation’ scene – I was so disappointed because I could tell half the people watching probably wouldn’t be paying all that much attention to him in comparison to Gale & co. Which breaks my heart, it is such an important moment in getting to know Finnick’s character as well as showing yet again how vile the Capitol is. I think it’s a moment that may show the divide between those who have read the books and those who haven’t maybe; because I found myself focusing more on him because I knew what he was going to be revealing. It really lacked the punch it had in the book.
    I personally didn’t have much issue with Moore as Coin (other than my general issues with Coin) but I can’t say I know her outside of the film.
    Apparently they used SFX on Josh, I read in Empire that Sam basically deprived himself of sleep and food whereas Josh was edited after. (He did make a comment that maybe Sam didn’t know that was an option..)
    I did miss Haymitch a bit but better not to over use him I suppose?
    Also, I completely agree that they really made District 13 far more interesting than in the book what with not having to stick with Katniss the whole time. I do wonder how easy it was to grasp the whole 13 thing seen as there’s not much deep explaining like in the books.

    I don’t think I’m going to handle the year long wait at all. The wait after Catching Fire was bad enough! At the same time I don’t want to rush it because I don’t want to say goodbye to certain characters yet (again)! :'(

    1. …actually I didn’t want to see it at theaters because it’s not my fav book out of the trilogy (especially for the way it handled certain dramas, not that the whole concept was wrong but I missed the sense of adventure of the first chapters lost in all that political melodrama; you certainly know what I’m referring to, even without going into spoiler-territory…)

      So I’ll wait for the dvd, however do you think they’ll go the same route as the book? It seems quite dark for a teen movie doesn’t it? Bye

      1. The whole concept of The Hunger Games Trilogy is dark though; kids killing each other, revolution, war, the books went there, the films certainly should especially since they’re doing such a good job with the material they have so far. I think to not go as dark wouldn’t do it justice – the books are about seeing how horrible things are and trying to change that. Which obviously results in differently terrible things happening.
        To pretend that no it’s not that bad would be daft – seeing that even people wanting good change can be untrustworthy is certainly something we should see.
        And revolution is a dark time even if it results in a dawn of a new age, that sometime people make personal sacrifices for the good of everyone else. I think they shouldn’t hide from that.
        But that’s just my thoughts. 🙂

        1. You’re right it’d fit to go that route for the film too (I was just slightly surprised, but it’s not wrong to go dark if it fits) but let’s just say that I’ve had my own issues with the final installment of the book at the same time. Certain themes should have been better handled, however I’ve no problem with the violence if it’s justified within the context, so we’ll see…even if personally (but that’s just my very own 2 cents) I’m more frightened by the kind of psychological 1 than the kind of in your face 1 that it’s shown progressing with the story (as with President Snow’s attitude, the gentle rose in that context seemed creepier than other grossier stuff).

          Or to make another simple example, the notorious HG ending with Peeta & Katniss with the berries was more thrilling that when you just sit down & say “yeah now it’s just blood for justice, yadda yadda”, you get what I mean (I’m not just speaking about the social impact this tale could have on teens, but also taking the style of the telling per-sé).
          That’s why frankly in the end I’ve preferred the 1rst half of the plot, it was subtler & more metaphorical than the 2nd half (that felt more like a déjavù of other things): especially IMO the big finale sucked for how rushed it was (I’m not complaining about the writer’s choices, but the way she put the puzzle together, fingers crossed that the movie will improve it).

          As said hopefully the people behind the movie will correct some *mistakes* done in the volume (e.g. as they already did changing the perspective, it’s not anymore 100% Katniss): I didn’t like how the author quickly dismissed some of the main characters too (Gale for inst., much ado for nothing y’know).
          I haven’t read it but I’ve heard that also the last part of “Divergent” saga suffered a similar fate…

          Anyway I’m also bothered from this Hollywood fashion of axing all the finales into 2 parts: at least in this case it wasn’t necessary (unless they want to strech some SLs/characters more?). Bye

    2. Thanks for reading! I also missed Haymitch but I did appreciate that they acknowledged that he is an alcoholic and didn’t shy away from the fact that he is an addict who needs help. On the whole, I felt this film did a pretty solid job with portraying the dark sides of the characters in these films EXCEPT for Finnick. Like you said, I paid for attention to him than Gale during that scene but I knew those who were unfamiliar would naturally be more drawn in to the action sequences.

      And yes, I saw an interview with Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson saying that his gaunt appearance was CGI. That amused me; apparently Josh isn’t a method actor. And yes, I can’t wait the full year either. I’m gonna be watching Catching Fire over and over till then.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: